Showing posts with label 2004. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2004. Show all posts
Thursday, May 14, 2020
Thursday, March 23, 2017
Monday, November 07, 2016
Sunday, June 12, 2016
Thursday, June 09, 2016
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Friday, April 22, 2016
Thursday, April 21, 2016
Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
Monday, January 18, 2016
Monday, January 11, 2016
【2016 Year of the Monkey - Continue with this monkey business/act : "I scratch your back, you scratch mine"】 【2016 猴年 - 继续扮演猴戏“我挠你的背,你挠我的背】【Maximum Card 极限片】
【2016 Year of the Monkey - Continue with this monkey business/act : "I scratch your back, you scratch mine"】
【2016 猴年 - 继续扮演猴戏“我挠你的背,你挠我的背】【Maximum Card 极限片】
【2004 Singapore Lunar New Year - Monkey 2004新加坡生肖猴】
Stamp issued on : 2004
Postmark :CDS, Singapore
Postcard :Asheville, USA
邮票发行日期 : 2004
邮戳 : 普通日戳,新加坡
明信片 :Asheville, USA 明信片
【2016 猴年 - 继续扮演猴戏“我挠你的背,你挠我的背】【Maximum Card 极限片】
【2004 Singapore Lunar New Year - Monkey 2004新加坡生肖猴】
Stamp issued on : 2004
Postmark :CDS, Singapore
Postcard :Asheville, USA
邮票发行日期 : 2004
邮戳 : 普通日戳,新加坡
明信片 :Asheville, USA 明信片
Sunday, December 13, 2015
Friday, April 03, 2015
Tuesday, March 31, 2015
Sunday, March 29, 2015
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
What's wrong of Maximum Cards being Philatelic ?
Traditional Philatelists used to comment and give remarks that Maximum Cards are being philatelic, I am always furious what is wrong with Maximum Card being philatelic ? Maximum Card was born philatelic, it is no way for it to be postally used, firstly, in accordance to the postal rules, postage stamps are NOT supposed to be affixed on the picture side for posting , so that this does NOT confuse the postal clerks whist processing the postmark cancellation on the postcard. Since the postal rules had NOT changed and will NOT be changed, hence, by affixing a postage stamp on the picture side obviously violates to the postal rule, therefore, the nature of a maximum card is man-made and philatelic in the sense. Maximaphily is a great hobby, it involves extensive personal researches to produce a maximum card. The process from searching for a postcard to seeking a relevant post office for the cancellation of a concordant postmark is an enormous task to be challenged by other categories of philately. If at all Traditional philately persists to look down upon Maximaphily owing to its nature , Maximaphily is always and prepared to stand on its feet. Deltiology with postal routes qualifies to be a part of philately, however, it is NOT in the world of philately, it stands on its own as DELTIOLOGY. If the umbrella of the Philately world is too large to shelter for Maximaphily, I will like to see Maximaphily to raise its own flag, it is ONLY in the true world of Maximaphily that we talk the same language.
- A maximum card created with "traditional games" stamp, CDS date Cancel @ Seremban
Monday, June 28, 2010
The story of the HEAD and TAIL
When I first created this Maximum Card, I had received numerous comments on the HEAD and TAIL of the Peafowl. One said : The stamp has to be removed from the miniature sheet to realise an MC, the other said : The MS is occupying too much a space on the overall MC, some said : the selvage of the MS cannot form part of the stamp, bla...bla.. bla .
If I were to remove the stamp from the MS, the phesant is left with the HEAD without the tail, will the bird look like a peafowl anymore ? I feel the most beautiful part of the pheasant is the tail, without the tail, it is no longer a peafowl.
Is the MS really occupying too much space on the MC ? This is so far the smallest MS issued in Malaysia, it is comparable to a large format stamp, what's wrong of having the full MS on the MC, really?
I feel a maximaphilist has to posses an artistic thinking, I feel I have every judgement to support my own creation.
- A maximum card created with "Malaysian Peafowl" stamp issued in 2004, FDI Pictorial Cancel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
恐龙 极限片 dinosaur maximum card (星加坡邮政 2015 Singpost)















.png)

